![]() | |||
higher production | |||
Orifices are typically made of saphire with 0.006´´ to 0.014´´ opening and last approximately 400 hr. Cost approximately $5 to $50. Nozzles are the highest wear item of the systems. Most US systems use a Roctec 100 nozzle from Boride Products which last from 125 to 250 hr. Cost $200 to $350 depending on the type of application. As the orifice wears the jet stream of water increases in diameter. Maintenance costs average near $15 to $35/hr of use. Abrasives for precision cutting are typically garnet with premium quality crushed garnet. Cost varies with the type of abrasives but garnet costs $0.15 to $0.40/lb and a typical machine uses between 0.5 and 2 lb/min with a typical size of 80 to 120 mesh. Pressures are typically 10,000 to 60,000 psi. Some work to increase pressures to 120,000 psi but this is still very experimental. Cleaning systems or abrasive slurry waterjets operate at lower pressures. Accuracy quotes vary. Some manufacturers give accuracy of machine movements, while others quote accuracy of finished parts. Typical limits on finished parts are ±0.005´´. Accuracy of movement of robotic arms and gantry systems are factors. With compensating software and tweaking of an experienced machine operator ±0.002´´ is possible. |
What's next?
Despite their successes, makers of waterjet equipment continue to improve products. At one extreme companies like JetEdge make relatively modest improvements in their basic system components. A new intensifier pump, self-aligning cutting head, and attenuator are improvements the company recently announced. At the other extreme, Flow is experimenting with pressurized systems at 100,000 psi and above to provide higher energy systems. Although the general trend is toward higher water pressures, safety and the lack of commercially available pumps and tubing are important development issues.
Other companies are searching for improved performance with systems at pressures below the 60,000 psi of most production systems. Notable is the work of Dr Donald Summers, director at the High Pressure Waterjet Laboratory at the University of Missouri, Rolla, MO, who was a founding member of the Waterjet Technology Association and the Int'l Society of Waterjet Associations. He anticipates wider acceptance of abrasive slurry waterjets, a technology introduced in 1986 by the British Hydraulics Research Group (BHR) and widely accepted in Europe.
Unlike the entrained abrasive waterjets common in the US, BHR's waterjets, also known under the tradename DIAJET, pump a slurry of abrasives and water through abrasive nozzles for a cutting rate three to four times faster using modest pressures around 10,000 psi. Although technology opponents contend that wear on slurry system components prohibits successful commercialization of the technology, critical problems have been solved, according to Nick Woodhead, president of US Jetting, Alpharetta, GA, the first US company to offer abrasive slurry jet machines.
Mr Woodhead reports that the new Supracut model can cut 1´´ to 4´´ thick materials such as stainless steels, outperforming plasma and laser cutting equipment. He asserts that such aggressive cutting is possible holding a ±0.002´´ accuracy. Describing a military decommissioning program that recently purchased one of his machines, he commented that his equipment is priced at a fraction of the cost of comparable entrained abrasive systems. Though untested by the rigors of US industrial applications, there appears to be ample evidence of the material removal characteristics of abrasive slurry and the technology should find a niche market.
In another approach, Extrude Hone, Pittsburgh, PA, seeks to use lower pump pressures and a polymer containing a suspension of abrasives. Although the abrasive suspension jet program is still in research stages, Dr Summers projects that the approach has merit and US companies can expect to see it available commercially.
Down to the nitty gritty
For the most part, abrasive waterjet technology uses garnet as the abrasive. Although many other abrasives such as olivine and slag by-products are available, they have distinct disadvantages in precision applications. Garnet's hardness, density, and sharpness provide a good compromise between cutting performance and nozzle wear. Harder abrasives such as aluminum oxide, for example, greatly shorten nozzle life. There still are no developments in diamond mixing tubes.
Recognizing the potential for market growth and the wide diversity of possible applications, companies like Cominco America have established new garnet mines and begun marketing the abrasives. Suppliers like FUSCO report that the choice of abrasive will depend on the finishing and cutting requirements for a particular application.
Barton Mines, North Creek, NY, continues as the major producer of premium quality crushed garnet used in precision applications. To Randy Rapple, vice president of sales, the decision is one of overall cost and the need for system performance. Lesser expensive alluvial garnet, like that from Barton's Australian operations, has users where precision and cutting rate are less important.
Source Box For more information from any of the following companies circle the appropriate number on the Reader's Service Card. ABB Flexible Automation, Boride Products, Bystronics Inc, ESAB L-Tec, Extrude Hone, Flow Int'l, Ingersoll-Rand, JetEdge, OMAX Corp, Auburn, WA http://www.omax.com US Jetting, |
The abrasive waterjet industry is growing and evolving through a wider diversification of applications. Research is leading to higher pressure systems and abrasives that are finer than the traditional 80 mesh used in systems today.
With the exception of a few large companies, makers assemble systems with components made by others who supply computer controls, software, pumps, waterjet heads, and gantry systems. Aware that simply combining components would not make a successful system, some companies are seeking alliances. The recent joint venture between Ingersoll-Rand and ABB Flexible Automation, both of Farmington Hills, MI, is one example. Control of waterjet cutting presents unique problems such as compensation for nozzle wear. Lag times and strategies for negotiating corners and curves are important for precision cutting. Therefore companies with experience and a database of material-specific data are best positioned to provide quality cutting systems. Mr Ward, for example, cautions that software written for robotic welding isn't satisfactory for waterjet applications.
Success spreads effectively by word of mouth, but experts agreed that understanding the capabilities of waterjet will come only through education both before and after purchase of machines. Machine tool controls that are quicker to learn and easier to use help overcome the fear factor common with new technology says Mr Burnum.
The state-of-the-art of abrasive waterjet shows a use and economical method of cutting a wide variety of common and exotic materials with precision and safety.
| Home |
T&P Magazine | T&P
Today | T&P
Archive T&P Market | T&P Directory | T&P Forum |
Copyright 1998 by Adams Business Media. All rights reserved. Please report problems to webmaster@aip.com. | ||